Method Functional Safety
support@methodfs.com

SIL Verification & PFD Calculation WorkshopWhat our delegates thought...

Spread of delegate scores

Data taken from last 50 results

90 - 100%
80 - 90%
70 - 80%
60 - 70%
50 - 60%
40 - 50%
30 - 40%
20 - 30%
10 - 20%
0 - 10%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10

Delegate rating of this course

Live Online Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Live Online 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Live Online 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.0%
Live Online 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.5%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 75.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.5%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 83.3%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 78.8%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 78.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.5%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.9%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.5%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 67.5%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 83.3%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 79.3%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.5%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 78.8%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.0%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 75.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.5%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.7%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.7%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.8%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.8%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.7%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.6%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.7%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.0%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.3%

Hitchin 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%

[Back to TUV Certified IEC 61511 Functional Safety Training page]

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"I gained skills/ knowledge which are useful after the course"

"I really had the feeling that I wouldn't be getting better quality or level of expertise in any other training environment."

"Good course to improve knowledge from 61511 course."

"A lot more to verification than just PFD calcs and HFT."

"I have gained a better understanding on Beta factor, PFD and budject calculations."

"What would you say to anyone thinking of attending this course? Attend!"

"Good for developing audit capabilities."

"Slightly improved, raised confidence, re-inforced/reminded on some aspects."

"Overall the trainer was excellent"

"Good exchange of ideas, going forward a new basis for me."

"Well presented and engaging"

"Recommended."

"I think the course had good content, it was good to learn about assessing the materials put out by manufacturers."

"It's what i need to do and how i need to do it."

"Well worth doing for this focused area of the SIS lifecycle. so often misunderstood in the process industries."

"Interesting hearing others experience."

"Have good background knowledge of difficult examples you have encountered to bring to the table."

"Overall the course was excellent"

"Good course delivered by a knowledgeable trainer."

"Excellent training style and level of knowledge. Even when presented with an unusual scenario you apply logic to the answer."

Method Functional Safety Projects

E: support@methodfs.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodfs.com

Address: Method Functional Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone:+44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodfs.com
Registered In England 08453480. VAT No. GB 159 9080 70. Site © Copyright Method Functional Safety Ltd 2026

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy.