Method Functional Safety
support@methodfs.com

SIL Verification & PFD Calculation WorkshopWhat our delegates thought...

Spread of delegate scores

Data taken from last 50 results

90 - 100%
80 - 90%
70 - 80%
60 - 70%
50 - 60%
40 - 50%
30 - 40%
20 - 30%
10 - 20%
0 - 10%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10

Delegate rating of this course

Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.5%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 79.3%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 79.4%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.1%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.5%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 67.5%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 83.3%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 79.3%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.5%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 78.8%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.0%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 75.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.5%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.7%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.7%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.8%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.8%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.7%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.6%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.7%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.0%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.3%

Hitchin 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%

[Back to TUV Certified IEC 61511 Functional Safety Training page]

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"I have learned to challenge assumptions made by suppliers to provide evidence of compliance."

"Quite a lot of things will be clearer but need to be taken away and applied."

"What would you say to anyone thinking of attending this course? Attend!"

"Good exchange of ideas, going forward a new basis for me."

"Recommend sitting 61511 first."

"Overall the learning experience was excellent"

"Overall the trainer was excellent"

"I really had the feeling that I wouldn't be getting better quality or level of expertise in any other training environment."

"It was good to understand that I'm not too far away from where I should be in my understanding."

"it has been a good refresher after attending the 61511 course 18months ago "

"Good for developing audit capabilities."

"It was a brilliant refresher in areas. Certification review was a key element including key documents and processes required to be checked."

"Good course to improve knowledge from 61511 course."

"Highly recommended."

"Much clearer knowledge of product selection relating to design requirements. Clearer understanding of how figures are acheived."

"Recommended."

"Have good background knowledge of difficult examples you have encountered to bring to the table."

"The trainer's knowledge and understanding of the material was expert"

"Learnt about various approaches, CASS templates and how to apply the skills in my role."

"Well presented and engaging"

Method Functional Safety Projects


Check your diary and reserve a place

Live Online Learning
Classroom Learning
June 01 - June 03 2026
SOLD OUT


E: support@methodfs.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodfs.com

Address: Method Functional Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone:+44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodfs.com
Registered In England 08453480. VAT No. GB 159 9080 70. Site © Copyright Method Functional Safety Ltd 2026

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy.