Method Functional Safety
support@methodfs.com

Functional Safety & SIL for OperatorsWhat our delegates thought...

Spread of delegate scores

Data taken from last 50 results

90 - 100%
80 - 90%
70 - 80%
60 - 70%
50 - 60%
40 - 50%
30 - 40%
20 - 30%
10 - 20%
0 - 10%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10

Delegate rating of this course

Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Live Online July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Live Online July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Live Online July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.3%
Live Online July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.8%
Live Online July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Live Online July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.2%
Live Online July 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.1%
Live Online September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.5%
Live Online September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Live Online September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.3%
Live Online September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.6%
Live Online September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.2%
Live Online September 2024 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.1%
Live Online January 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online January 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online January 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Live Online January 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.5%
Live Online January 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.0%
Live Online January 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 96.0%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.0%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.0%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.8%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.6%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.5%
Live Online March 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.8%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.3%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.0%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.2%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.7%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Live Online February 2021 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online January 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Live Online January 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.0%
Live Online January 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.3%
Live Online January 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Live Online January 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.0%
Live Online January 2020 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.7%
Glasgow October 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Glasgow October 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.5%
Glasgow October 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.7%
Glasgow October 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 91.8%
Glasgow October 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 93.4%
Glasgow October 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.8%

Glasgow 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.4%

[Back to TUV Certified IEC 61511 Functional Safety Training page]

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"I am better equipped now to look out for SIL issues."

"Very enjoyable."

"Overall the course was excellent "

"Well worth attending."

"The trainer delivered the material in an interesting and engaging way. "

"its intuitive and makes you aware of your sarroundings / Well worth itI have learned to continuously review & make improvements "

"The balance of theory and practice was right"

"It gave me a better scope of how to look at safety "

"An insight / appreciation of the subject "

"A good informative course on Functional safety"

"The course fully met its stated objectives"

"The trainer was organised and well prepared. "

"Overall the trainer was excellent"

"Helped me bridge the gap between LOPA analysis and onsite functional safety."

"Its intuitive and makes you aware of your surroundings "

"Learned the importance of Functional Safety."

"We need to promote the importance of Functional Safety across site. Well worth attending."

"Overall the trainer was excellent"

"Well worth it "

"I learned a few new acronyms."

Method Functional Safety Projects


Check your diary and reserve a place

Live Online Learning
Classroom Learning
-
SOLD OUT


E: support@methodfs.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodfs.com

Address: Method Functional Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone:+44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodfs.com
Registered In England 08453480. VAT No. GB 159 9080 70. Site © Copyright Method Functional Safety Ltd 2026

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy.