Method Functional Safety
support@methodfs.com

SIS Hardware Design to IEC 61511What our delegates thought...

Spread of delegate scores

Data taken from last 50 results

90 - 100%
80 - 90%
70 - 80%
60 - 70%
50 - 60%
40 - 50%
30 - 40%
20 - 30%
10 - 20%
0 - 10%
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10

Delegate rating of this course

Live Online Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 0.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.5%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 79.3%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 79.4%
Live Online February 2026 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.1%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.5%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Live Online January 2025 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 67.5%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 83.3%
Live Online February 2023 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 79.3%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 82.5%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 81.7%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 78.8%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 77.0%
Birmingham November 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 75.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 70.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 80.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 85.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.5%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.0%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.8%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.7%
Grimsby February 2019 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 100.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 99.0%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 98.7%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.8%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 97.8%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.7%
Dunfermline December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 95.6%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 90.0%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 92.5%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 86.7%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.8%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 87.0%
Hitchin December 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 88.3%

Hitchin 2018 Delegate Rating Average Delegate Rating : 89.3%

[Back to TUV Certified IEC 61511 Functional Safety Training page]

We asked our delegates what they would say to anyone thinking of attending this course:

"It was good to understand that I'm not too far away from where I should be in my understanding."

"Recommended."

"Interesting hearing others experience."

"Practical experience calculating SIL values for various configurations."

"Excellent content/course for application of verification in workplace."

"Bring some examples of practical problems found within your project. Copies of bad certs and establish why you have chosen the device."

"I think the course had good content, it was good to learn about assessing the materials put out by manufacturers."

"This course is quite specialist, but it is very helpful in furthering understanding of applying some of the more intricate aspects of functional safety and giving you more confidence in your abilities and understanding."

"Excellent training style and level of knowledge. Even when presented with an unusual scenario you apply logic to the answer."

"Overall the course was excellent"

"Quite a lot of things will be clearer but need to be taken away and applied."

"A very worthwhile course—clear and directly applicable to real SIL verification and PFD work."

"Very worthwhile, enhanced my understanding of a life-cycle topic I have very little experience in."

"Good for developing audit capabilities."

"Good exchange of ideas, going forward a new basis for me."

"Recommend sitting 61511 first."

"Highly recommended."

"It's what i need to do and how i need to do it."

"Have good background knowledge of difficult examples you have encountered to bring to the table."

"Very useful to those with an existing understanding of the subject."

Method Functional Safety Projects


Check your diary and reserve a place

Live Online Learning
Classroom Learning
June 01 - June 03 2026
SOLD OUT


E: support@methodfs.com. T: 44 (0)1462 713313. W: www.methodfs.com

Address: Method Functional Safety Ltd. Method House, Davis Crescent, Hitchin, SG5 3RB
Phone:+44 (0)1462 713313 Email: support@methodfs.com
Registered In England 08453480. VAT No. GB 159 9080 70. Site © Copyright Method Functional Safety Ltd 2026

Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy.